From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBA1C54EE9 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:58:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C5D426B0075; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:58:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id BE4F46B007B; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:58:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id A389694000A; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:58:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D2B6B0075 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:58:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin11.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E38AA0C7 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:58:37 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79940027874.11.14D0517 Received: from ale.deltatee.com (ale.deltatee.com [204.191.154.188]) by imf25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE0DA0012 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:58:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=deltatee.com; s=20200525; h=Subject:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:content-disposition; bh=lIqeYmIYKdZ39Sv7iKx98PZ/aFncvZ/B1l8HysQoIhk=; b=I75dP8r9MX4OiRESuJQ15NM69H E7EPt6dmj1RLUSLfLdHSdQgN1mX1Mps+QUyXlvHfee+UqpkHTb6XVDmWWJmc+SsSXElXncswhSea/ n7ClPcuX8C+GwiXwMt/bA9+YVdTDgHYaqcPfaUTSE2PgJgFZGhE5WKHVUC+x9lJkdalVuklY4Xq8n nEI+f/4MSCesrWAsHDl7LEYeD/yhSatwrHa4riE/CQsWfphlfqxmoZ49pmeUh05ZlrdcurIihp0za NSFZ6gpSHMV26d1luCPA7bAblBb7vBlDXKICtG6AtRLly1VcBQJPVRZYaHZ6jleuswBvQRteHobdp Z4DBeTVg==; Received: from s0106a84e3fe8c3f3.cg.shawcable.net ([24.64.144.200] helo=[192.168.0.10]) by ale.deltatee.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1obNef-00848L-ST; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 08:58:22 -0600 Message-ID: <0074a009-9ece-6617-b66d-d003593d153e@deltatee.com> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 08:58:16 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0 Content-Language: en-CA To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Dan Williams , Jason Gunthorpe , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=c3=b6nig?= , John Hubbard , Don Dutile , Matthew Wilcox , Daniel Vetter , Minturn Dave B , Jason Ekstrand , Dave Hansen , Xiong Jianxin , Bjorn Helgaas , Ira Weiny , Robin Murphy , Martin Oliveira , Chaitanya Kulkarni , Ralph Campbell , Stephen Bates References: <20220825152425.6296-8-logang@deltatee.com> <4a4bca1e-bebf-768f-92d4-92eb8ae714e1@deltatee.com> <20220920064613.GB17325@lst.de> From: Logan Gunthorpe In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 24.64.144.200 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hch@lst.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, christian.koenig@amd.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com, ddutile@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, dave.b.minturn@intel.com, jason@jlekstrand.net, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, jianxin.xiong@intel.com, helgaas@kernel.org, ira.weiny@intel.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, martin.oliveira@eideticom.com, ckulkarnilinux@gmail.com, rcampbell@nvidia.com, sbates@raithlin.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: logang@deltatee.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/8] PCI/P2PDMA: Allow userspace VMA allocations through sysfs X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 13 Feb 2021 17:57:42 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on ale.deltatee.com) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1663858716; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=lIqeYmIYKdZ39Sv7iKx98PZ/aFncvZ/B1l8HysQoIhk=; b=zjWRV1iAxzsPwG1p++pxMSGUndTF/aLiKaEI9abDWXrWMrQrpw2go1NvW+210vXfrxTxCF wr85T6IGj+TPHC/lxoGjHhwMzH/dGWX44VMxY+NQO/xfpyYaH06m5QD6vaAhRWIjn+mbSg KK4y8ITZkH2nIhae2ZiOuxlaUWsSPXU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf25.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=deltatee.com header.s=20200525 header.b=I75dP8r9; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=deltatee.com; spf=pass (imf25.hostedemail.com: domain of logang@deltatee.com designates 204.191.154.188 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=logang@deltatee.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1663858716; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=3C7s9nA7ZIo1gZ5bGkgReknUrDKEcn6/IjwK9exarNS3JQMECk5CVT4UwFjLlJSf3NJKtE O8fPDPqwjFi0PZdMKo9YRnLmPEjKzGVVpLhHpcakYiTVVMTg72kEG31s8DGO8A9rlEgwwX iUFQJzdMNgRs99B03tNQySiaEXtEBqE= X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: zotkadkghdu865qogxhhhnomn53xque1 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9AE0DA0012 Authentication-Results: imf25.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=deltatee.com header.s=20200525 header.b=I75dP8r9; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=deltatee.com; spf=pass (imf25.hostedemail.com: domain of logang@deltatee.com designates 204.191.154.188 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=logang@deltatee.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam08 X-HE-Tag: 1663858713-766318 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 2022-09-22 02:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 08:46:13AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 12:46:54PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: >>> See the diff at the bottom of this email. I can apply it on top of this >>> patch, but IMO it is neither easier to follow nor maintain. Unless you >>> have a different suggestion... >> >> Greg, can you chime in on this? Besides this item we just have a few >> cosmetic bits left I think, and I'd really like to get the series into >> this merge window. >> > > I don't seem to have this in my inbox at all anymore, sorry. > > The original should be fine, Logan, thanks for trying to split it out a > bit more. So this can be taken as-is for 6.1-rc1. Thanks Greg, I'll send a v10 with changes from the other feedback later today. Logan