From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Problems with RAID 4/5/6 and kmem_cache
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:56:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0000014142863060-919062ff-7284-445d-b3ec-f38cc8d5a6c8-000000@email.amazonses.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1379646960-12553-1-git-send-email-jbrassow@redhat.com>
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Jonathan Brassow wrote:
> 4) kmem_cache_create(name="foo-a")
> - This FAILS because kmem_cache_sanity_check colides with the existing
> name ("foo-a") associated with the non-removed cache.
That should not happen. breakage you see will result. Oh. I see the move
to common code resulted in the SLAB checks being used for SLUB.
The following patch should fix this.
Subject: slab_common: Do not check for duplicate slab names
SLUB can alias multiple slab kmem_create_requests to one slab cache
to save memory and increase the cache hotness. As a result the name
of the slab can be stale. Only check the name for duplicates if we are
in debug mode where we do not merge multiple caches.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Index: linux/mm/slab_common.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/slab_common.c 2013-09-20 11:49:13.052208294 -0500
+++ linux/mm/slab_common.c 2013-09-21 16:55:23.097131481 -0500
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
continue;
}
+#if !defined(CONFIG_SLUB) || !defined(CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON)
/*
* For simplicity, we won't check this in the list of memcg
* caches. We have control over memcg naming, and if there
@@ -69,6 +70,7 @@
s = NULL;
return -EINVAL;
}
+#endif
}
WARN_ON(strchr(name, ' ')); /* It confuses parsers */
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-21 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-20 3:15 Jonathan Brassow
2013-09-20 3:16 ` [PATCH] RAID5: Change kmem_cache name string of RAID 4/5/6 stripe cache Jonathan Brassow
2013-10-10 22:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-10-11 2:37 ` Brassow Jonathan
2013-09-21 21:56 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2013-09-28 6:49 ` [PATCH] Problems with RAID 4/5/6 and kmem_cache Pekka Enberg
2013-10-02 14:43 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0000014142863060-919062ff-7284-445d-b3ec-f38cc8d5a6c8-000000@email.amazonses.com \
--to=cl@linux.com \
--cc=jbrassow@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox