From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx175.postini.com [74.125.245.175]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79ED36B0006 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:51:11 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 21:51:09 +0000 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] slub: Check for page NULL before doing the node_match check In-Reply-To: <1358458996.23211.46.camel@gandalf.local.home> Message-ID: <0000013c4a7e7fbf-c51fd42a-2455-4fec-bb37-915035956f05-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <1358446258.23211.32.camel@gandalf.local.home> <1358447864.23211.34.camel@gandalf.local.home> <0000013c4a69a2cf-1a19a6f6-e6a3-4f06-99a4-10fdd4b9aca2-000000@email.amazonses.com> <1358458996.23211.46.camel@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Steven Rostedt Cc: LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Pekka Enberg , Matt Mackall , Thomas Gleixner , RT , Clark Williams , John Kacur , "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > c->tid = next_tid(c->tid); > > - c->page = NULL; > > c->freelist = NULL; > > + c->page = NULL; > > I'm assuming that this is to deal with the same CPU being able to touch > the code? > > If so, it requires "barrier()". If this can affect other CPUs, then we > need a smp_wmb() here, and smp_rmb() where it matters. This is dealing with the same cpu being interrupted. Some of these segments are in interrupt disable sections so they are not affected. The above is a section where interrupts are enabled so it needs the barriers. > > @@ -2227,8 +2227,8 @@ redo: > > if (unlikely(!node_match(page, node))) { > > stat(s, ALLOC_NODE_MISMATCH); > > deactivate_slab(s, page, c->freelist); > > - c->page = NULL; > > c->freelist = NULL; > > + c->page = NULL; > > goto new_slab; > > } > > Interrupts are disabled so we do not need to change anything here. > > @@ -2239,8 +2239,8 @@ redo: > > */ > > if (unlikely(!pfmemalloc_match(page, gfpflags))) { > > deactivate_slab(s, page, c->freelist); > > - c->page = NULL; > > c->freelist = NULL; > > + c->page = NULL; > > goto new_slab; > > } > > Ditto which leaves us with: Index: linux/mm/slub.c =================================================================== --- linux.orig/mm/slub.c 2013-01-17 15:49:57.417491975 -0600 +++ linux/mm/slub.c 2013-01-17 15:50:49.010287150 -0600 @@ -1993,8 +1993,9 @@ static inline void flush_slab(struct kme deactivate_slab(s, c->page, c->freelist); c->tid = next_tid(c->tid); - c->page = NULL; c->freelist = NULL; + barrier(); + c->page = NULL; } /* -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org