From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx155.postini.com [74.125.245.155]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3323B6B005A for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:54:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:54:44 +0000 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [Q] Default SLAB allocator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <0000013a6aed8d12-71a82caf-366a-425c-a963-79077f62d673-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <1350392160.3954.986.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <507DA245.9050709@am.sony.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Ezequiel Garcia Cc: Tim Bird , Eric Dumazet , David Rientjes , Andi Kleen , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "celinux-dev@lists.celinuxforum.org" On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > It might be worth reminding that very small systems can use SLOB > allocator, which does not suffer from this kind of fragmentation. Well, I have never seen non experimental systems that use SLOB. Others have claimed they exist. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org