From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx125.postini.com [74.125.245.125]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 390CC6B00AA for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:31:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:31:03 +0000 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] slub: correct the calculation of the number of cpu objects in get_partial_node In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <000001395978f794-7569c405-1955-4e20-ad74-6e60ee4efcdc-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <1345824303-30292-1-git-send-email-js1304@gmail.com> <1345824303-30292-2-git-send-email-js1304@gmail.com> <00000139596a800b-875d7863-23ac-44a5-8710-ea357f3df8a8-000000@email.amazonses.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: JoonSoo Kim Cc: Pekka Enberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Sat, 25 Aug 2012, JoonSoo Kim wrote: > But, when using "cpu_partial_objects", I have a coding style problem. > > if (kmem_cache_debug(s) > || cpu_slab_objects + cpu_partial_objects > > s->max_cpu_object / 2) > > Do you have any good idea? Not sure what the problem is? The line wrap? Reduce the tabs for the third line? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org