From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31F192EC0 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from userp2120.oracle.com (userp2120.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3473113A for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:47:09 +0000 (UTC) To: Thomas Gleixner From: "Martin K. Petersen" References: <20190827134836.GB25038@kroah.com> <20190827153344.GC534@kroah.com> <20190827195351.GA30710@kroah.com> <20190828090837.GA31704@kroah.com> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 08:46:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Thomas Gleixner's message of "Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:53:33 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Joel Fernandes , Barret Rhoden , ksummit , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jonathan Nieder , Tomasz Figa , Han-Wen Nienhuys , Theodore Tso , David Rientjes , Dmitry Torokhov , Dmitry Vyukov Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Allowing something Change-Id (or something like it) in kernel commits List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Thomas, >> However, requiring proper follow-up headers is yet another thing for me >> to manually police. Maybe we could add a line of defense and make >> patchwork complain if somebody posts a -vN without a suitable >> --in-reply-to? > > That's horrible in various mail clients. Post the new series stand alone > and add > > Link://lore.kernel.org/r/$MESSAGE_ID_OF_V$N-1 > > to the cover letter and you have a trail. I'm not sure why it would get messed up if the patches are clearly tagged as vN? As far as I'm concerned, the more we automate, the better. Both in terms of producing the links, but also in terms of verifying that they are present and correct when patches are applied. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering