From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E24AFA for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 15:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 432BF1FB50 for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 15:50:05 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: From: "Peter Huewe" To: "Wolfram Sang" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 17:44:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20140514152224.GA12911@katana> References: <20140509170709.GA9747@redhat.com> <20140511111034.GA6400@katana> <53706EAB.7010601@monstr.eu> <20140512093235.GA2872@katana> <1400074363.4759.8.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <537374D0.8020307@roeck-us.net>, <20140514152224.GA12911@katana> Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] coverity, static checking etc. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Ditto. I personally use 'C=1 CHECK="ninja-check"' which is a wrapper > which calls all static analyzers I know of. +1 on ninja-check Care to share your wrapper? Peter