From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E33B9D3 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 07:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 297348B for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 07:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 09:31:14 +0200 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Johannes Berg In-Reply-To: <1536304837.3766.4.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <20180906094158.1eba4f50@canb.auug.org.au> <20180905222437.5d2a1730@vmware.local.home> <20180907091842.6c55bd9a@canb.auug.org.au> <1536304837.3766.4.camel@sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: ksummit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] API replacement/deprecation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 09:20:37 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 09:03 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > How about providing some lightweight check script for git commit hook, > > and let each maintainer install it? > > What Julia suggested seems easier: Just drop a script to check for it > into scripts/coccinelle/, and 0-day build bot should run it > automatically on pretty much everything, afaict? For trivial tasks like checking the missing sign-off, it's far quicker to run locally. Then you'll notice it before publishing, so no risk that is pulled by others. For more comprehensive checks, yeah, 0-day bot coverage would be great. Takashi