From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0D926 for ; Thu, 22 May 2014 08:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38C321FA42 for ; Thu, 22 May 2014 08:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 10:03:29 +0200 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Geert Uytterhoeven In-Reply-To: References: <20140516030708.GV27822@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20140522.064910.1233749401586905587.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Johan Herland , Junio C Hamano , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Jason Cooper Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TOPIC] Metadata addendum to git commit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , At Thu, 22 May 2014 09:49:44 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > >> Yes, unless you add it (using git-notes) as an annotation to the fix > >> commit, but then you're back to the (perceived) problem of sharing > >> those notes. > >> > >> Alternatively, you would have to find a different mechanism for > >> developers to insert entries into their reverse mappings from > >> post-facto/missing "Fixes:" tags. > > > > After reconsidering this, now I don't think we can rely only on Fixes > > tag. The addendum notes are useful for other purposes, e.g. finding > > external links. And, yet one useful thing by addendum is that you can > > mark the regression no matter whether it's already fixed or not. With > > Fixes-tag reverse mapping, you can find only fixed regressions, but > > not open regressions. > > Do you want to import the whole bug tracking system, too? ;-) Oh no. But just adding a regression tag to a commit would be no hard work for maintainers, I suppose. Takashi