From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] How can we treat staging drivers better?
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 15:35:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hbm9ccbie.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
The staging driver is a wonderful process to promote the downstream
code to the upstream, but I have doubt whether it's working really as
expected for now.
- Often the drivers live forever in staging although they should have
been moved to the upper, properly maintained, subsystems.
- Code changes in staging are mostly only scratching surfaces, minor
code style cleanups, etc, what checkpatch suggests.
- There are little communications with the corresponding subsystem;
already a few times I was surprised by casually finding a staging
driver code by grepping for preparing API changes.
- Then some drivers are pushed back after long time stay in staging
(lustre is the recent remarkable case);
it's understandable, but is definitely no happy end in both sides,
after all.
So, I'd like to hear how we can improve the staging driver situation,
a better communication with staging driver people and the subsystem /
core devs.
thanks,
Takashi
next reply other threads:[~2018-09-05 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-05 13:35 Takashi Iwai [this message]
2018-09-05 13:55 ` Dan Carpenter
2018-09-05 14:03 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-09-05 14:20 ` Greg KH
2018-09-05 14:41 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-09-05 14:59 ` Shuah Khan
2018-09-05 14:51 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-09-05 14:59 ` Joe Perches
2018-09-05 14:08 ` Sean Paul
2018-09-05 14:22 ` Greg KH
2018-09-05 14:29 ` Sean Paul
2018-09-05 15:35 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-09-05 16:21 ` James Bottomley
2018-09-05 16:35 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-09-07 19:44 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-08 8:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-09-10 18:49 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-09-10 18:52 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-09-10 18:58 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-09-10 19:22 ` Tim.Bird
2018-09-10 20:51 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-09-11 0:30 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-11 9:13 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5hbm9ccbie.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox