From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tiwai@suse.de>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28C231379
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 18 Sep 2018 20:48:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1CC0805
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 18 Sep 2018 20:48:03 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 22:48:00 +0200
Message-ID: <s5h7ejiv8fz.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180918163231.GB10134@agluck-desk>
References: <CAKMK7uE=FwpPFnvOvuvGBZ0vjh3UMPW=zgSk1dmiyCLQPPuZvg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20180917115916.37fd5388@coco.lan>
	<CAPM=9tzSaQX7iVCH94jrM+xgEveY4B8+DwQSykiE3L0BM-s-Pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<2174637.IVJC5EhCEq@avalon> <20180918160236.GK2471@sirena.org.uk>
	<20180918163231.GB10134@agluck-desk>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: mchehab+samsung@kernel.org, Tim Bird <tim.bird@sony.com>,
	ksummit <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] community
	management/subsystem governance
List-Id: <ksummit-discuss.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>

On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 18:32:34 +0200,
Luck, Tony wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 09:02:36AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
> > At least with Outlook the problem is partly that Outlook's model of how
> > e-mail works isn't really able to cope with what we need, it translates
> > everything into internal formats in a way that is at best fragile for
> > what we need.
> 
> Or, shock, horror, tell one-time contributors that it is OK to
> put the patch in an attachment to the e-mail.  Outlook doesn't
> (usually) mess with the contents of attachments.

Yeah, that's what I usually ask as the last resort if anything else
can't help.  It's a bit of pain to expand the attachment in the reply,
but, hey, I'm using Emacs, the great OS itself :)


Takashi