From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A249C94F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EA34FD for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:31:28 +0200 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis Subject: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Regression tracking List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , As this topic doesn't seem posted yet, let me pitch. Until recently, we've had no regression tracking since Rafael stepped down from the maintenance of regression list. Now fortunately, Thorsten started gathering and posting the regression reports on ML again, and this helps already a lot. Though, it immediately raised me a few things to be discussed: - How can we keep it rolling stably at this time? - How can each developer / maintainer help or be involved better? - Can we provide better services than only a plain text list on ML? Also, since the regression on stable trees was a hot topic: - Should the regression tracking cover the stable trees? How well does it scale? thanks, Takashi