From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C55D11113 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2018 18:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B896EA8 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2018 18:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 20:54:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" In-Reply-To: <20180923183407.GA2774@thunk.org> Message-ID: References: <20180922131640.pxjwukrckggxtg3s@mwanda> <20180923183407.GA2774@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Security List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, 23 Sep 2018, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > > 3) there simply is a need for CRD process for the kernel (which pretty > > much by definition is not happening publicly). Currently, security@ > > serves that purpose, so if you make that public, you have to > > instantiate some other process to deal with CRDs. > > Can you expand the acronym "CRD". "Coordinated release date" across the various affected vendors. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs