From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF0B1EC8; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 17:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="vC7q25/+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79162C433C8; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 17:25:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1699550743; bh=byD0TUNcFEisLkZzFJpMbNAJc7N7fewTfu5QubYhp1E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=vC7q25/+cwGGDX4KDW8nUGDAgD48EV10meVHv0s74uMpucEV/VMVweqy7Dkrf10Ar Nx6lFSmicRFXWNXiTXxCsSFbn8u+dHb0kIM9gu8KbWyZdUhLadYxvDoiS+BPpFXNjZ 8GpqSrE7xKRYl9bXzSRsajv4U1nN42o8732xr5BU= Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 12:25:42 -0500 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Alex Elder Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Dan Carpenter , Steven Rostedt , Joe Perches , Mark Brown , users@linux.kernel.org, ksummit@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [workflows]RFC: switching "THE REST" in MAINTAINERS away from linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: References: <20231106-venomous-raccoon-of-wealth-acc57c@nitro> <20231106110547.6956a430@gandalf.local.home> <280f404dcaab5a1cee2cc67f829c1d85aa91d772.camel@perches.com> <6737487f097401510c87f38239d2f75e22fca46d.camel@perches.com> <20231108140415.46f84baa@gandalf.local.home> <20231109092701.GG21616@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <903adc04-b56f-4b40-b009-4a760b3ff404@ieee.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <903adc04-b56f-4b40-b009-4a760b3ff404@ieee.org> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:14:38AM -0600, Alex Elder wrote: > My input is that whatever the outcome of all this discussion, please > define it as policy and have get_maintainer.pl implement it. I don't > want to have to think too hard about who *should* be included (beyond > people I already know). Yes, I fully agree with you -- people shouldn't need to know where the patches should be going. The tooling should decide this for them, and I want to change the tooling so that it no longer includes linux-kernel@vger on everything, only on patches without any other mailing list matches. -K