From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
ksummit@lists.linux.dev, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: Clarifying confusion of our variable placement rules caused by cleanup.h
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 11:11:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f895328e-43f3-426b-ab2b-ee750edab324@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wiCOTW5UftUrAnvJkr6769D29tF7Of79gUjdQHS_TkF5A@mail.gmail.com>
On 2025-11-18 10:38, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Now, we currently don't use __auto_type very much outside of macros
> (and there we often use "typeof(x)" instead for historical compiler
> reasons), but I suspect we probably should. There's a patch floating
> around that makes it more convenient with a
>
> #define auto __auto_type
>
> because the historical C 'auto' keyword has been so completely and
> utterly useless.
>
Indeed, and this matches C++ and C23.
The only thing about it was that it got to be fuzzy the best way to upstream it.
Do you want me to send you the patchset during the merge window?
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-18 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-18 16:39 James Bottomley
2025-11-18 17:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-11-18 18:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-18 19:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-11-18 19:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-18 20:43 ` Al Viro
2025-11-18 19:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-18 19:11 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2025-11-18 19:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-18 19:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-18 19:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-11-18 19:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-18 19:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-11-18 20:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-18 21:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-18 20:21 ` James Bottomley
2025-11-18 20:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-18 20:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-11-18 21:10 ` James Bottomley
2025-11-18 22:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-11-18 23:32 ` James Bottomley
2025-11-18 19:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-18 20:28 ` James Bottomley
2025-11-25 13:09 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-25 14:25 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2025-11-25 15:32 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-25 16:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-11-25 17:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f895328e-43f3-426b-ab2b-ee750edab324@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=ksummit@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox