From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
ksummit@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] The role of AI and LLMs in the kernel process
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 12:25:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e52df6bb-cee3-46e1-9e05-6abb42174c85@suswa.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2508060747440.3518@hadrien>
On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 07:49:24AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2025, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >
> > Another genuinely good usage for AI is for especially non-English
> > speakers to tidy up their patch comments and other documentation.
>
> There are also some parts of the kernel that are supposed to have
> comments, such as memory barriers. AI could help ensure that the comments
> are actually meaningful, and perhaps suggest to the developer how they
> could be improved (sort of a 0-day for comment quality).
>
I feel like I have seen patches where people have generated AI
documentation for locking. The problem is that if you ask AI to write
something it always has a very confident answer but normally it's vague
and slightly wrong. It takes no time to generate these patches but it
takes a while to review them.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-06 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-05 16:03 Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 16:43 ` James Bottomley
2025-08-05 17:11 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-05 17:23 ` James Bottomley
2025-08-05 17:43 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-05 17:58 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 18:16 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-05 18:01 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 18:46 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-05 19:18 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 17:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-08-05 17:55 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 18:23 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-12 13:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-08-05 18:34 ` James Bottomley
2025-08-05 18:55 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-12 13:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-08-05 18:39 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-05 19:15 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 20:02 ` James Bottomley
2025-08-05 20:48 ` Al Viro
2025-08-06 19:26 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-07 12:25 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-07 13:00 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-11 21:26 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-08-12 14:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-08-06 4:04 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2025-08-06 20:36 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-05 21:58 ` Jiri Kosina
2025-08-06 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-06 19:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-06 19:35 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 18:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-08-05 18:19 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-06 5:49 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-06 9:25 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2025-08-06 9:39 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-06 19:30 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-12 14:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-08-12 15:02 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-12 15:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-08-12 15:25 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-12 15:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e52df6bb-cee3-46e1-9e05-6abb42174c85@suswa.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=ksummit@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox