From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A47AE724 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from basicbox7.server-home.net (basicbox7.server-home.net [195.137.212.29]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7EC028B for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:58:54 +0000 (UTC) To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Takashi Iwai References: <1560409.5vnWShrmDy@vostro.rjw.lan> <4b6ef14c-cea6-b51d-62db-ba3e708916ea@leemhuis.info> From: Thorsten Leemhuis Message-ID: Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 21:58:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4b6ef14c-cea6-b51d-62db-ba3e708916ea@leemhuis.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Regression tracking List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 27.07.2016 14:28, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 26.07.2016 22:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 04:31:28 PM Takashi Iwai wrote: > My rough plan after doing regression tracking for a few weeks now: Look > a bit closer at patchwork and check if it can be adjusted to automate > the boring parts of regression tracking. I have a mostly finished mail > that has some more details on what got me thinking into that direction, > but I'm on holiday till Friday and wanted to send it out once I'm home > again. FWIW, I posted my mail to LKML now: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e473a90f-7a20-52e8-0158-94f283638f34@leemhuis.info Some of the thoughts and ideas mentioned there might be relevant for a kernel summit discussion about regression tracking; let me know if there is anything else I could do to help. Ciao, Thorsten