From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D873B55 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4116201 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:45:07 +0000 (UTC) To: Linus Torvalds , Alexandre Belloni References: <20170627135839.GB1886@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <20170706144028.46a2mt2mdzpt6ip7@mwanda> <20170707113650.ee6oys5u4vq5hgdi@mwanda> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F613009A7@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> <20170710173335.4ksnso6dzaekoxz4@piout.net> From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:44:55 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dan Carpenter , ksummit , Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] is Kconfig a bit hard sometimes? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 07/10/2017 11:28 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Alexandre Belloni > wrote: >> >> I know the yes trick works for kernels older than 3.7 but maybe people >> should start using make olddefconfig ;) > > Honestly, I wish more people just ran "oldconfig" and then started > complaining about people adding insane Kconfig options. > > I seem to be the only one ever pushing back against some of the people > out there that add Kconfig options that really make zero sense (or > that add the oddest drivers or features with a crazy "default this > thing to on"). I could -- and I have a few times. But usually it needs a $maintainer to make others listen. I'm just a lurker. -- ~Randy