From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CADE89F for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEA2F156 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:08:51 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:08:49 +0200 From: Julia Lawall To: Greg KH In-Reply-To: <20160826112635.GA27627@kroah.com> References: <20160826044651.GA25341@sasha-lappy> <20160826112635.GA27627@kroah.com> Message-ID: Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, "Levin, Alexander" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Self nomination - Sasha Levin List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Le 26.08.2016 13:26, Greg KH a écrit : > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:46:51AM -0400, Levin, Alexander wrote: >> - Making checkpatch check for (some) of the stable kernel rules >> (and possibly recommend adding the stable@ tag in certain cases?). >> - Depends on: making checkpatch sane again. > > This sounds interesting. What do you mean by "sane"? "sane" as in > rewriting it so that someone who isn't a perl master can modify it? Or > "sane" as in "don't be so pedantic about things that don't matter"? Wouldn't that require interpreting the log message as well? julia