From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6A09B76 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 08:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D83518A for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 08:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 10:42:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina To: Theodore Ts'o In-Reply-To: <20170804022639.p27oliuinqqatar2@thunk.org> Message-ID: References: <20170804022639.p27oliuinqqatar2@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Andy Lutomirski Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER TOPIC] ABI feature gates? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 3 Aug 2017, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > One way that we could try to make things better is by having some kind > of semi-automated system which monitors changes in include/uapi/*.h in > linux-next. It's unfortunately just uapi though, and for sysfs it's a bit more difficult to define a pathname pattern to watch for. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs