From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29BC2B2E for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:34:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FB5E14E for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:34:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina To: James Bottomley In-Reply-To: <1493217078.2526.8.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Message-ID: References: <20188905.kHbMkj7sB6@avalon> <1834084.5qZ8rLimvk@avalon> <1492631703.3217.30.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <3f55980c-1e8d-c841-2555-472ed10eb2fc@sandisk.com> <20170426084253.yvxyzb3khh2fej4j@mwanda> <1493217078.2526.8.camel@HansenPartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: ksummit , Dave Airlie , Greg Kroah-Hartman , David Miller , Doug Ledford , Bart Van Assche , Ingo Molnar , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] "Maintainer summit" invitation discussion List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 26 Apr 2017, James Bottomley wrote: > When we tried this in SCSI we had mixed results. The problem is that > holding up patches in this way causes even more complaints, so you have > to be really disciplined about it (and up front about the reasons). Another problem is that sending e-mail containing 'Reviewed-by:' is way too easy if it's being motivated by something else than a real desire to actually perform the review. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs