From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9B85FE6 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 17:51:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from namei.org (namei.org [65.99.196.166]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD1D0F8 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 17:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 03:51:14 +1000 (AEST) From: James Morris To: Shuah Khan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, olof@lxom.net, Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Review - Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 24 Sep 2018, Shuah Khan wrote: > This decision to change the existing "Code of Conflict" signed off by a large number of developers, > has been changed and committed with a few people signing off on it. > > It would be good to know the circumstances that necessitated the decision to include this patch > without the proper review process. if that isn't possible, it is important to follow the review > process now for v2. Also, discussing this in the Maintainer summit and/or kernel summit will not > make the community feel like it is a community approved decision. At least, kernel community should > be given a chance to discuss this change just like any other change. Not speaking on behalf of my employer, I agree with all of the above. -- James Morris