ksummit.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, olof@lxom.net,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Review - Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 03:51:14 +1000 (AEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1809250351090.21310@namei.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf7638b9-c25d-d47e-f539-192a43268122@kernel.org>

On Mon, 24 Sep 2018, Shuah Khan wrote:

> This decision to change the existing "Code of Conflict" signed off by a large number of developers,
> has been changed and committed with a few people signing off on it.
> 
> It would be good to know the circumstances that necessitated the decision to include this patch
> without the proper review process. if that isn't possible, it is important to follow the review
> process now for v2. Also, discussing this in the Maintainer summit and/or kernel summit will not
> make the community feel like it is a community approved decision. At least, kernel community should
> be given a chance to discuss this change just like any other change.

Not speaking on behalf of my employer, I agree with all of the above.

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-24 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-24 14:24 Shuah Khan
2018-09-24 17:51 ` James Morris [this message]
2018-09-24 18:11   ` John W. Linville
2018-09-24 19:54     ` Josh Triplett
2018-09-24 20:46     ` Olof Johansson
2018-09-24 22:21       ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-25  4:26         ` Daniel Vetter
2018-09-25  6:21           ` Olof Johansson
2018-09-25  8:45             ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-25 16:42               ` Daniel Vetter
2018-09-25 20:03                 ` Shuah Khan
2018-09-25  6:46           ` Dan Williams
2018-09-24 19:31 ` Jason Cooper
2018-09-26 20:57   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-24 23:15 ` James Bottomley
2018-09-25  1:35   ` Joe Perches
2018-09-26  6:54     ` Jani Nikula
2018-09-26  9:19       ` Jan Kara
2018-09-26  9:58         ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-09-26 12:35           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-26 16:43         ` Mark Brown
2018-09-26 17:03           ` Tim.Bird
2018-09-26 12:30   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-26 12:51     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-09-26 14:01     ` Shuah Khan
2018-09-25 10:56 ` Jani Nikula
2018-09-25 13:38   ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-09-25 15:22     ` Shuah Khan
2018-09-25 16:51       ` Tim.Bird
2018-09-26  8:04         ` Laura Abbott
2018-09-26 14:47           ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-09-27  8:30             ` Laura Abbott
2018-10-04 16:27 ` James Bottomley
2018-10-05 18:10   ` Shuah Khan
2018-10-06 21:39     ` James Bottomley
2018-10-07 15:27       ` Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.21.1809250351090.21310@namei.org \
    --to=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=olof@lxom.net \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox