From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16ECCB35 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from namei.org (tundra.namei.org [65.99.196.166]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F6F4199 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:50:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 04:50:46 +1000 (AEST) From: James Morris To: Kees Cook In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <87k2skzmhs.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Emily Ratliff Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Kernel Hardening List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, Kees Cook wrote: > Should we have a separate discussion for bug-hunting? KASan needs to > expand its architecture coverage, Trinity needs a maintainer, and > there's always new things happening with smatch and coccinelle. > > I'd just like to keep bug-hunting entirely separate from > self-protection, as I feel they're distinct topics (though related). I agree -- this needs to be a separate, related discussion. -- James Morris