ksummit.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] asynchronous printk
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:59:50 -0600 (MDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1610310757340.26271@cbobk.fhfr.pm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161031135617.bs7df7kur23gvm6b@thunk.org>

On Mon, 31 Oct 2016, Theodore Ts'o wrote:

> > Any chance to do this session on Tuesday?
> > I prepared some slides; there are some patches circulating
> > and there are some things to discuss.
> 
> Unless there are strong reasons why this needs to be done on Tuesday,
> my preference would be to try to schedule tech topics on Wednesday or
> Thursday.  But sure, I'm happy to schedule such a topic if folks are
> interested.  Let me know what your potential conflicts might be and/or
> a preferred time slot.

(speaking for Petr Mladek, who is currently travelling): please don't 
schedule this for wednesday afternoon, as that'd create a LPC miniconf 
conflict.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-31 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-19  3:47 Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-19  3:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-07-19  6:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-07-19  6:49   ` Josh Triplett
2016-07-19  7:02     ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-07-19  7:11       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-07-20  6:02         ` Jan Kara
2016-07-20 22:54       ` Josh Triplett
2016-07-21  0:46         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-21  1:12           ` Josh Triplett
2016-07-19  7:33   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-19  7:38     ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-07-19  7:46       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-19  8:02         ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-07-19  8:23           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-21 10:36           ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-21 12:31             ` Jan Kara
2016-07-28  2:55             ` Steven Rostedt
2016-07-20  6:09       ` Jan Kara
2016-07-19  7:46   ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-07-19  7:53     ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-07-19 13:55       ` Jan Kara
2016-07-28  2:59         ` Steven Rostedt
2016-07-28  4:12           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-28 13:02             ` Steven Rostedt
2016-07-20  3:35   ` Wangnan (F)
2016-07-21  1:16     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-21  1:52       ` Wangnan (F)
2016-07-21  5:59       ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-07-21 10:31         ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-21 11:19           ` Josh Triplett
2016-07-21 11:59             ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-21 14:21               ` Josh Triplett
2016-07-21 14:40                 ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-28  3:05                 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-02 11:59               ` Petr Mladek
2016-07-21 15:05           ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-26 14:40             ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-26 15:44               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-07-26 21:00               ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-27  0:03                 ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-27  1:16                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-21 10:28       ` David Woodhouse
2016-07-19 14:45 ` James Bottomley
2016-07-19 14:55   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-19 17:58     ` James Bottomley
2016-07-19 18:24       ` Viresh Kumar
2016-07-20  2:08       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-07-20  6:14     ` Jan Kara
2016-09-21  4:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-31  6:54   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-31 13:56     ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-10-31 13:59       ` Jiri Kosina [this message]
2016-10-31 14:56       ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk considered harmful (was: [TECH TOPIC] asynchronous printk) Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-31 16:18         ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-10-31 18:21           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-31 18:26             ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk considered harmful Hannes Reinecke
2016-10-31 20:28           ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk considered harmful (was: [TECH TOPIC] asynchronous printk) Jan Kara
2016-11-01 12:27             ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk considered harmful Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-01 17:50         ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] printk considered harmful (was: [TECH TOPIC] asynchronous printk) Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.00.1610310757340.26271@cbobk.fhfr.pm \
    --to=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox