From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32A9B83D for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A85B8E2 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 23:36:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina To: Dmitry Torokhov In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <87a8guq9y8.fsf@intel.com> <20160803132607.GA31662@kroah.com> <20160803141937.GA9180@kroah.com> <57A21252.7000407@roeck-us.net> <20160803161234.GA32965@dtor-ws> <57A21F88.7000504@roeck-us.net> <20160803172015.GA36266@dtor-ws> <20160803182105.GA11395@roeck-us.net> <20160803185902.GB36266@dtor-ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: James Bottomley , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] stable workflow List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Umm, that is not what I meant. I said that I wanted "naked" cc:stable > only to apply top the latest stable. I understand that, but I intentionally proposed the rule a little bit more "exact", because meaning of "latest stable" might potentially be different at the time of the patch being commited to subsystem tree, and at the time of the commit actually appearing in Linus' tree (which is the point at which -stable notices). Probably a slight corner case, but why not make it more specific by default. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs