From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D49E6258 for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2016 08:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B8E3152 for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2016 08:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 10:37:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina To: Dmitry Torokhov In-Reply-To: <20160709000648.GG28589@dtor-ws> Message-ID: References: <5780334E.8020801@roeck-us.net> <2544945.WExZRG40u7@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160709000648.GG28589@dtor-ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] stable workflow List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Also, do we have many changes that go to stable without maintainers > actually adding cc: stable annotation in mainline? I have a feeling (but it's not backed up by any proper statistics) that we do have quite a high number of such patches. Yes, sure, the maintainer is later CCed on the patch in the -stable queue review patchbomb, but that's unfortunately in practice not the same thing as if he actually actively considered the patch for inclusion himself. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs