From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C80D570A for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BCF720253 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:38:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina To: Jan Kara In-Reply-To: <20140812143333.GB3270@quack.suse.cz> Message-ID: References: <20140812143333.GB3270@quack.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] printk unconference List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Jan Kara wrote: > Sasha and Jiri also expressed interest in discussing some topics regarding > printk in the thread (printk tinification, printk inside NMI - although > that is getting resolved AFAIK). Well, there are mutiple aproaches floating around for printk inside NMI, and no final conclusion has been reached yet; so discussing this might be worthwhile (even though Steven wouldn't be present, which is a bit inconvenient, as his aproach seems to be the one that will hopefully head towards merging). -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs