From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875A3875 for ; Wed, 7 May 2014 11:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55EE31FB51 for ; Wed, 7 May 2014 11:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 13:48:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina To: Josh Triplett In-Reply-To: <20140506203426.GA15428@jtriplet-mobl1> Message-ID: References: <20140506190024.GA1004@kroah.com> <20140506160740.1245d1f4@gandalf.local.home> <20140506203426.GA15428@jtriplet-mobl1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Reviewing new API/ABI List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 6 May 2014, Josh Triplett wrote: > From 424c7365ed5ed64190a1d08fe30c8e86832368b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Josh Triplett > Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 13:20:25 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add linux-api for review of API/ABI changes > > This makes it more likely that patch submitters will CC API/ABI changes > to the linux-api list, and tools like get_maintainer.pl will do so > automatically. > > Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett > --- > MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 7578deb..52a282b 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ S: Supported > F: Documentation/scsi/aacraid.txt > F: drivers/scsi/aacraid/ > > +ABI/API > +L: linux-api@vger.kernel.org > +F: Documentation/ABI/ > +F: include/linux/syscalls.h > +F: include/uapi/ > +F: kernel/sys_ni.c > + It'd be nice to have also sysfs changes covered as well if this is not just about API, but also ABI; I am not sure whether this could be covered by MAINTAINERS pattern, but at least mentioning this list in Documentation/ABI/README seems appropriate. (I am also wondering who is actually subsribed to the linux-api@ mailinglist, given the low general awareness of its existance :) ). -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs