From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] "depth" of the tree of maintainers
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 21:42:12 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1405022121070.29834@pobox.suse.cz> (raw)
Is our tree too flat? This might turn into just a question to Linus than
really a discussion topic.
It seems to me (and it has been the case for a few past years, so it's
probably not an issue at the end of the day) like there are many places
where we are violating a natural tree-like hierarchy our development model
has, with many people sending pull requests directly to Linus instead of
going through sub-maintainers. Is this really a problem? If so, how to
deal with it?
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
next reply other threads:[~2014-05-02 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-02 19:42 Jiri Kosina [this message]
2014-05-02 20:04 ` Johannes Berg
2014-05-02 20:33 ` John W. Linville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.00.1405022121070.29834@pobox.suse.cz \
--to=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox