From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0BFBBE7 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 15:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D76B82F for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 15:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 17:16:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Andrea Parri In-Reply-To: <20190629134329.GA4620@andrea> Message-ID: References: <7b73e1b7-cc34-982d-2a9c-acf62b88da16@linuxfoundation.org> <20190628205102.GA3131@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> <20190629134329.GA4620@andrea> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Peter Zijlstra , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Patch version changes in commit logs? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 29 Jun 2019, Andrea Parri wrote: > > Can we pretty please agree on that format and make it mandatory? > > Makes all sense to me. One question/remark: > > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst says: > > "If the patch follows from a mailing list discussion, give a URL to the > mailing list archive; use the https://lkml.kernel.org/ redirector with > a ``Message-Id``, to ensure that the links cannot become stale." > > and it does not mention "lore.kernel.org": does this doc want an update? Yes. lkml.kernel.org/r was the initial redirector, but lore is the new thing. > FWIW, I've been trying to conform to "lkml.kernel.org" (which currently > seems just a redirection to "lore.kernel.org") since [1], and I do know Yes, its switched from marc.info to lore. > of at least a few subsystems out there recommending such URLs. I find them pretty useful. Thanks, tglx