From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 705EDCAE for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2018 10:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [146.0.238.70]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18715713 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2018 10:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 12:50:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab In-Reply-To: <20180908074708.249571f4@coco.lan> Message-ID: References: <1536263073.6012.3.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1536263475.6012.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20180908074708.249571f4@coco.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: James Bottomley , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER TOPIC] Succession Planning: Is It time to Throw Linus Under a Bus? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 8 Sep 2018, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Also, if we want to consider the bus scenario and other disaster > threats, it could be worth to consider having them geographically > distributed (if possible even on different Countries). And consequently forbid them to ever meet at the same place ....