Re: [Ksummit-discuss] "Maintainer summit" invitation discussion

[Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>]

On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Alexandre Belloni wrote:

> On 20/04/2017 at 07:24:13 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:20:37 -0700
> > James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> escreveu:
> >
> > >    1. Since most people agree that these form of notifications are useful,
> > >       should we have a standard email for it (or at least a list of things
> > >       which should be in that email, like commit-id, tree, maintainer,
> > >       mailing list and the version of the kernel it is expected to be
> > >       pushed for).
> > >    2. Given that we all run ad-hoc infrastructure to produce these emails,
> > >       could we get a set of blessed scripts up on kernel.org for all
> > >       comers so we can use the central infrastructure rather than rolling
> > >       our own.
> >
> > I suspect that this very much depends on the way each maintainer handle
> > patches. For subsystems like media, where we use patchwork, notification
> > comes for free with the tool.
> >
>
> I think patchwork notifications are sent only to people with a patchwork
> account so this is not enough for subsystems with a lot of drive-by
> contributors.

I receive such notifications and don't have an account, as far as I know.

julia

>
>
> --
> Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
> _______________________________________________
> Ksummit-discuss mailing list
> Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss
>