From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F0ED9DE for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.32]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261C120371 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 12:17:38 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: Fengguang Wu In-Reply-To: <20140814150152.GA4597@localhost> Message-ID: References: <5370DB7B.2040706@fb.com> <20140512235430.GA16440@thin> <1399941081.2648.51.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20140814150152.GA4597@localhost> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Daniel Borkmann , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TOPIC] Application performance: regressions, controlling preemption List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Fengguang Wu wrote: > The proc-vmstat, perf-profile, cpuidle, turbostat etc. "monitors" are > inspired by Mel Gorman's mmtests suite and they are really helpful in > catching&analyzing the subtle impacts a patch might bring to the system. Mel also has some interesting tests in the suite like the page fault test and aim9 among numerous others. Could those also be added?