From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159C9A01 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:57:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.24]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B417520247 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 11:57:04 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: "John W. Linville" In-Reply-To: <20140612133554.GB4073@tuxdriver.com> Message-ID: References: <20140611194504.GA2683@kroah.com> <20140612133554.GB4073@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Redesign Memory Management layer and more core subsystem List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, John W. Linville wrote: > AF_PACKET provides some level of hardware abstraction without a lot of > overhead for networking apps that are prepared to deal with raw frames. > Is this the kind of networking API you would propose? The kernel is still in the data path and will cause limitations in terms of bandwidth and latency.