From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58227AF6 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 17:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.211]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99D92034B for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 17:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 12:52:00 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: James Bottomley In-Reply-To: <1399657343.2166.61.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Message-ID: References: <1399595490.2230.13.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <20140509122451.5228a038@gandalf.local.home> <1399657343.2166.61.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Sarah Sharp , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg KH , Julia Lawall , Darren Hart , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Kernel tinification: shrinking the kernel and avoiding size regressions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 9 May 2014, James Bottomley wrote: > > Global optimization may allow the folding of small functions into a larger > > one when advantageous (which is not simple to determine). > > It's possible, but complex ... I'd really like to see proof that it > helps before thinking about it. The proof may mean that one will have to do the work.