From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC7682D for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 00:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from utopia.booyaka.com (utopia.booyaka.com [74.50.51.50]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95E301FD49 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 00:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 00:52:40 +0000 (UTC) From: Paul Walmsley To: Olof Johansson In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1400925225.6956.25.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: James Bottomley , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 28 May 2014, Olof Johansson wrote: > That's why I'm somewhat hesitant to label every reviewer a > maintainer since it's hard to tune expectations. Yes - the designated reviewers would be expected to follow the architecture or guidelines set out by the maintainers. - Paul