From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 003.mia.mailroute.net (003.mia.mailroute.net [199.89.3.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EE922C08D5 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 18:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.6 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759947291; cv=none; b=CrQY+oBDkBVqhL27jC6YnRY/78hKw6f4oVoEwI+kctBxnGgZLzurCezOm6E/y61r5OCPwt+08GIQo2fR7zo/XsU4sdtbZnzpG/4LmyQXhzBi0b9O/YVlZgAg4Ss3NQFWJ84x6TXZX7P5XIfDoGrqKMN3R7JrTLZ82mMdFUhb1Nw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759947291; c=relaxed/simple; bh=slOhs1hXlyJxZ0Rgzvz+OwRH8PKWMEgqTyW+l8VUXB4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=E6J6/DPEbId+D+pfmPMyYYDrDwQFRLzZdgl0c+bQu+MQPHgIkqelYv/D+YpRETLxKphv7rljadha9kkNV3RGDX0qzZN7ifqia56BUJdehH+0pUgMh5UhhZenNv6xt9+aR4yXNzQRgRemrIlqdoEsBqr1hepg/3sLu6NCGLBP/UM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=U+nZWLqH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.6 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="U+nZWLqH" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 003.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4chh473NBxzlh3sX; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 18:14:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1759947286; x=1762539287; bh=slOhs1hXlyJxZ0Rgzvz+OwRH 8PKWMEgqTyW+l8VUXB4=; b=U+nZWLqHCcPrH3if75x+WxL0ODzvjZWDArrmu4fq cjq5n+o7NFJ3h+hYML0S4YPUB5LRNrCvZRRlQg1/7cDR685DsV21oQje5Blopsbu jQ3bNzr/ATTAyhka5J5psOb6tKhuGTpl3n3IW9TGEHtJmb26u2DLNvQ8MZzmXXY9 CmCQRQ0zpXfCd939x7K2kr5LyCGtoDXJYH4h+PLIz4NFsYsZ2SqB1IW+rVUyaQ1+ MrxnNNVKuQ6zelm38Qc+ihhuS72NYjf5vBYkacevIbndJGFfdVRoFnb64UVSM1/q CRLCF7U2FOFq2CJExpTpy3uFB1tAo1mLJcPQ+UiGCgdOow== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 003.mia.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (003.mia [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id JOFOibTEl1p7; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 18:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.119.48.131] (unknown [104.135.180.219]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 003.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4chh440YcdzlgqV1; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 18:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 11:14:42 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS / KERNEL SUMMIT] AI patch review tools To: Chris Mason , ksummit@lists.linux.dev, Dan Carpenter , Alexei Starovoitov References: <28cd7001-0a24-4dff-a4c7-714495bff7f0@acm.org> <3ffd9164-919e-4fea-8597-601452537331@meta.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <3ffd9164-919e-4fea-8597-601452537331@meta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/8/25 11:04 AM, Chris Mason wrote: > Claude really needs aggressive use of checklists to get it to stay > focused, other AIs may need other tricks. Would that be a reason to avoid Claude for code reviews? All I need to make ChatGPT or Gemini come up with a code review is to tell it that it should review a kernel patch pretending that it is an experienced kernel developer and also what issues it should look for. The AI kernel patch review prompts I have seen from my colleagues are about 30-40 lines long. However, I do not know what copyright license applies to these prompts so I cannot share these prompts. Thanks, Bart.