From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
ksummit@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] The role of AI and LLMs in the kernel process
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 07:04:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJLUMuEhFsSxHgPM@p183> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJJP2BM658FYJdJv@lappy>
On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 02:39:20PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> I don't think we should expect a bar for AI that is higher than the one
> we set for humans.
We absolutely should.
There is a thing with computers is that they are perfect. They are so
infinitely perfect compared to humans that anything downgrading computers
levels of perfection to humans level of perfection must be rejected
because it can't be scaled back and thus will be permanent loss.
Would you install calculator application which you know reports wrong
results 1% of the time?
Would you uninstall calculator after realizing it has 1% bug rate?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-06 4:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-05 16:03 Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 16:43 ` James Bottomley
2025-08-05 17:11 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-05 17:23 ` James Bottomley
2025-08-05 17:43 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-05 17:58 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 18:16 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-05 18:01 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 18:46 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-05 19:18 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 17:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-08-05 17:55 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 18:23 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-12 13:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-08-05 18:34 ` James Bottomley
2025-08-05 18:55 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-12 13:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-08-05 18:39 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-05 19:15 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 20:02 ` James Bottomley
2025-08-05 20:48 ` Al Viro
2025-08-06 19:26 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-07 12:25 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-07 13:00 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-11 21:26 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-08-12 14:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-08-06 4:04 ` Alexey Dobriyan [this message]
2025-08-06 20:36 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-05 21:58 ` Jiri Kosina
2025-08-06 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-06 19:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-06 19:35 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 18:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-08-05 18:19 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-06 5:49 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-06 9:25 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-08-06 9:39 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-06 19:30 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-12 14:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-08-12 15:02 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-12 15:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-08-12 15:25 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-12 15:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJLUMuEhFsSxHgPM@p183 \
--to=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=ksummit@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox