From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACEA81F8EE0; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729533410; cv=none; b=AXNPfx4WpGxrQvJNZPO09k2WBo0gkA31teGoeC0hfL8FcGEKu4T8K3qOwPr0zwoAMkB8jBfBwTX2LsjEh41ZSPmRJq2z9puwNoHeob0uFnHyxeJ+N20asTG0XByWEWW1yj+lZvVneaJJZTaYLSs2+kqpnT3cPsNppsK1pFeLk2E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729533410; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PoMYB0MBTluKGbrOcMZ2NG103OhIvWMsk4YgoHV9f70=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=aGszTNrmjynGLvGj6m3L6PadO9l5pkdkw7VI9PWIFycEo+jOxqZZQavehdN5jt7pIzBDMYya+fbiyZ50yoQrU/g4ciLp3QQX5GzCr94WxIIS63o1cVZadOjZlP0GYOoO7HJYkbXu9x+XjVJx3FkD8+1Du5C2CqgToDmbqRlBVes= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ClhW/BCh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ClhW/BCh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FC84C4CEE8; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:56:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729533410; bh=PoMYB0MBTluKGbrOcMZ2NG103OhIvWMsk4YgoHV9f70=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ClhW/BCheoLjCVUeO5Hrv+Aur7HSWu9EYLAi7inVvuP8oVd/KvwFmNfKgmkkRbsaF z+6ZybIESrdi+ullcxIg7R3Ftil8pZoSiu9/cSLe/FTQJIarUhfxivMrCrT8S99Z/J 5mekzkdWxZfWDkm/6aMcl3dgIHErSqYmu4nHDRdf8od7tgcfz/as4KsEKqUxJEsSJL L9DREu6fgNlQe8ZnVAFg0/FJFaOo+5xvQhNM1akt9ybMNrIBPbBbo9MRuQrBUOBhf4 7zKSdyn9Y/NtaIXKF592EvoFZcy/q3zjZjh1uVGu4u+SnOHN7maGcwH871lDW6Fm6G uaQ5FCMUKy0QQ== Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:30:06 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: Bart Van Assche Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, ksummit@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki Subject: Re: linus-next: improving functional testing for to-be-merged pull requests Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 10:24:53AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: >On 10/21/24 9:07 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: >>Current testing: >>   - LKFT: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/sashal-linus-next/ >>   - KernelCI: https://t.ly/KEW7F > >Hi Sasha, > >Is blktests included in any of the above? If not, please consider >including it. During the past few years we have noticed that the >test failures reported by this test suite are most of the time caused >by kernel bugs. Sometimes issues in the tests are discovered but this >is rare. See also https://github.com/osandov/blktests/. Hey Bart, I don't plan on doing any tests on my own, but rather have our existing CI infra (kernelci, LKFT, etc) deal with the actual testing part of things. AFAIK KernelCI if working on adding blktests support! Thanks! -- Thanks, Sasha