From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84533288EB for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 17:12:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4442C433C8; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 17:12:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1692897151; bh=VUGckIKKW7EuqYr2XaeqDpxPiqVIWyQRrEi92D3vQS8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gPLXUwSh5q3fycpZ4UnCUL2Lkd+zIvePFr9ERSdiQCTCCDqTyozf4S6yTIx8CZD27 pNFWxo92iAokynK2be/F6yeYjQ44t1/b0YH+CWWcMNYpDbELCWtLNZXweyfqhilyAK KuVw71ATVUMAJ9onc2XbGdxm3joasedQInUbdBq9cZxSnuiWVJhDoeskCst2+MZVSi HKlulVb2YERlGBKk3foijvIbC5YcPRbBgPFqoB1b7MhWZxwCWHzkaNAmXVRqWIhAU5 LQFr/Y27loOTDaz84a9ztKSy++Nv8SqewgYLjeSKDMuL9+EviJL8O3n5UcPgPxJKFk oOg8zrIwTIjBQ== Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 18:12:23 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Linus Walleij Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , Laurent Pinchart , Greg KH , Dan Williams , ksummit@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Between a rock and a hard place, managing expectations... Message-ID: References: <64e404a979f54_4c1f3294d3@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch> <2023082250-replace-rectangle-1d47@gregkh> <20230822142913.GB14596@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hAu0xVq+yYMC4mf/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Give him an evasive answer. --hAu0xVq+yYMC4mf/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 10:16:31AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > Since then they come a long way, after a few generations of lost > hardware that the kernel never supported properly, Android is > pushing the Generic Kernel Image and being more restrictive about > proprietary extensions every day. It's going the right way. > Todd Kjos at Google and Greg Kroah-Hartman from the community > have been instrumental here. I do have some concerns about the effects of GKI on framework improvements, by making it difficult for vendors to update any of the shared APIs it pushes them into implementing anything they can't get =66rom the frameworks in their drivers instead. This means if they're going to upstream things and do the best job possible they'll end up working on multiple versions which provides a bunch of stop energy. Life will be much easier for vendors if they just worry about their specific devices as much as possible. --hAu0xVq+yYMC4mf/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmTnj3YACgkQJNaLcl1U h9BD2Qf/bdQM1ClVduHHnkrSwf1fFu4ZYhL9m0RttyYYD6lQtr4C2eqj0q18pVEm MnmALYTNAdqyvaGQBIRNyijvNDWfxGljCstghiCVYSaCx28JJaVDsDsr0C1DXB2L KMcJ5+QmyYft5Sm13r6do+Oiq0HRReHmYbCY0pO+TZcqD3KMBdC2hwyI9wR6pXs5 WnRfqFqdKhBwS5eyFrVDhQACdU6mYUwPBxUNxgwMWpze07zz7MvpX9fbmNpqxb/N +j/cm7n0e/LWJlJbTNAKVaToQZAy4ISVFRG8hg9aeMMsnAGKeV9mrOQb2L/JF/yQ C0EVhP4rOjevWrawGswzVbHik2ynAQ== =IBNC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hAu0xVq+yYMC4mf/--