From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 286C671 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 13:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from netrider.rowland.org (netrider.rowland.org [192.131.102.5]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D3F323B for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 13:17:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:10:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Alan Stern To: Hannes Reinecke In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: jakub@redhat.com, parri.andrea@gmail.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com, luc.maranget@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Memory model, using ISO C++11 atomic ops List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > I have been playing around with RCUs and memory barriers quite a lot > recently, and found some really 'odd' use-cases in the kernel which > would benefit from improvements here. Could you post one or two examples? It would be interesting to see what they involve. Alan Stern