From: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 2/2] code-of-conduct: Strip the enforcement paragraph pending community discussion
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 14:15:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <FA87081B-1344-4CC8-8BCC-F00A985719FF@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1538861851.4088.7.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
On 6 Oct 2018, at 17:37, James Bottomley wrote:
> Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities
> outlined in
> the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is
> concern
> that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the
> enforcement clauses to give the community time to consider and debate
> how this
> should be handled.
Even in the places where I don't agree with the discussion about what
our code of conduct should be, I love that we're having it. Removing
the enforcement clause basically goes back to the way things were. We'd
be recognizing that we know issues happen, and explicitly stating that
when serious events do happen, the community as a whole isn't committing
to helping.
It's true there are a lot of questions about how the community resolves
problems and holds each other accountable for maintaining any code of
conduct. I think the enforcement section leaves us the room we need to
continue discussions and still make it clear that we're making an effort
to shift away from the harsh discussions in the past.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-08 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-06 21:35 [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 0/2] code of conduct fixes James Bottomley
2018-10-06 21:36 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses James Bottomley
2018-10-07 8:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-07 15:25 ` Shuah Khan
2018-10-07 9:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-10-07 9:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-10-07 15:29 ` James Bottomley
2018-10-08 19:49 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-07 17:53 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-10-07 22:25 ` Dave Airlie
2018-10-07 22:56 ` Al Viro
2018-10-07 23:02 ` Al Viro
2018-10-07 23:37 ` Dave Airlie
2018-10-08 10:14 ` Mark Brown
2018-10-08 19:32 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-08 17:05 ` Luck, Tony
2018-10-08 14:08 ` James Bottomley
2018-10-10 16:36 ` Pavel Machek
2018-10-08 15:20 ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-08 15:30 ` James Bottomley
2018-10-08 19:23 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-08 19:57 ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-09 10:55 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <1718828.OxLgMoHbrt@siriux>
2018-10-09 18:56 ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-09 19:38 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-10-09 19:44 ` James Bottomley
2018-10-08 19:24 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-10 20:48 ` Frank Rowand
2018-10-06 21:37 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 2/2] code-of-conduct: Strip the enforcement paragraph pending community discussion James Bottomley
2018-10-06 21:43 ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-07 3:33 ` James Bottomley
2018-10-08 13:51 ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-08 14:09 ` James Bottomley
2018-10-08 17:58 ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-08 18:11 ` James Bottomley
2018-10-08 18:54 ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-08 15:03 ` jonsmirl
2018-10-08 15:37 ` Alan Cox
2018-10-11 7:42 ` Dan Carpenter
2018-10-07 15:32 ` Shuah Khan
2018-10-07 17:56 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-10-07 19:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-08 18:15 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2018-10-08 19:04 ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-08 20:23 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-10 15:53 ` Alan Cox
2018-10-10 17:19 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-10 20:09 ` Alan Cox
2018-10-10 20:30 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-10 20:32 ` Dave Airlie
2018-10-07 17:11 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 0/2] code of conduct fixes Daniel Vetter
2018-10-07 17:40 ` James Bottomley
2018-10-07 17:50 ` jonsmirl
2018-10-07 17:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-10-10 16:12 ` Pavel Machek
2018-10-10 16:25 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=FA87081B-1344-4CC8-8BCC-F00A985719FF@fb.com \
--to=clm@fb.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox