ksummit.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@sonymobile.com>
To: "shuah.kh@samsung.com" <shuah.kh@samsung.com>,
	"ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
	<ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] kselftest - What's in 3.17 and plans for 3.18 and beyond
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 20:24:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <F5184659D418E34EA12B1903EE5EF5FD0130D4AC5B84@seldmbx02.corpusers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53E38ED5.9000300@samsung.com>

On Thursday, August 07, 2014 7:36 AM,  Shuah Khan wrote:
> 
> As a first step towards a larger goal to enable developer
> friendly kernel testing framework, a new make target is
> planned for 3.17. In addition, 3.17 includes work done to
> fix tools/testing/sefltests to run without failures.
> 
> Short summary of work done so far for 3.17:
> 
> - fix compile errors and warnings in various tests
> - fix run-time errors when tests aren't run as root
> - enhance and improve cpu and memory hot-plug tests
>    to run in limited scope mode by default. A new make
>    target to select full-scope testing. Prior to this
>    change, cpu and memory hot-plug tests hung trying to
>    hot-plug all but cpu0 and a large portion of the memory.
> - add a new kselftest target to run existing selftests
>    to start with.
> 
> What's planned for 3.18 and beyond:
> 
> - get feedback on the new kselftest target from the community
> - add more tests to be run under kselftest umbrella
> - identify existing tests under /lib and other areas that
>    make a good candidate to be included under kselftest
> - Some of these could be run as a tool and/or a independent
>    test with a few changes and some probably aren't like the
>    /lib/locking tests.
> - As a goal, try to leverage existing tests and modify them
>    as needed to run them as a black-box test (e.g: look into
>    ways to make it run as a tool)
> - Greg KH sparked the kernel selftest idea, has been in the loop
>    for the work done so far, and reviewed the plan for 3.18.

I'm quite interested in this (as is the CEWG), and I have lots of questions.
Will this be discussed/presented at KS or LinuxCon?  Should I ask my
questions on this list or wait until Chicago?  Are there any LKML threads
with info I can look at in the meantime?

Thanks.  This sounds like great work.
 -- Tim

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-07 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-07 14:36 Shuah Khan
2014-08-07 18:24 ` Bird, Tim [this message]
2014-08-07 19:59   ` Shuah Khan
2014-08-08  2:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-11 14:11   ` Shuah Khan
2014-08-11 16:13     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-12 13:00       ` Grant Likely
2014-08-12 16:15         ` Guenter Roeck
2014-08-12 16:21           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-12 16:51             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-08-12 17:15             ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-08-12 16:23           ` Grant Likely
2014-08-12 16:49             ` Mark Brown
2014-08-13  6:26               ` Grant Likely
2014-08-13 10:40                 ` Mark Brown
2014-08-13 11:12                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-08-13 12:42                     ` Mark Brown
2014-08-13 13:08                       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-08-13 15:00                   ` Kevin Hilman
2014-08-13 16:40                     ` Olof Johansson
2014-08-13 17:11                       ` Mark Brown
2014-08-12 17:46             ` Tim Bird
2014-08-12 18:06               ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-12 20:52                 ` Tim Bird
2014-08-14 16:35                 ` Grant Likely
2014-08-12 17:30           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-12 16:34         ` Shuah Khan
2014-08-13  8:35         ` Linus Walleij
2014-08-13 16:11           ` Guenter Roeck
2014-08-13 16:16             ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-13 16:44               ` Bird, Tim
2014-08-13 17:07                 ` Grant Likely
2014-08-13 17:10                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-13 17:10                 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-08-18  3:10               ` Rob Landley
2014-08-18  3:08             ` Rob Landley
2014-08-18  7:16               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-08-13 16:45           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-18  3:18             ` Rob Landley
2014-08-13 15:06         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=F5184659D418E34EA12B1903EE5EF5FD0130D4AC5B84@seldmbx02.corpusers.net \
    --to=tim.bird@sonymobile.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=shuah.kh@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox