From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50C20F2E for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0126.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.126]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA0C042D for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:10:37 +0000 (UTC) From: To: , Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:10:33 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20180917115916.37fd5388@coco.lan> <2174637.IVJC5EhCEq@avalon> <20180918160236.GK2471@sirena.org.uk> <20180918163231.GB10134@agluck-desk> In-Reply-To: <20180918163231.GB10134@agluck-desk> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: mchehab+samsung@kernel.org, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] community management/subsystem governance List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > -----Original Message----- > From: Luck, Tony=20 >=20 > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 09:02:36AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote: > > At least with Outlook the problem is partly that Outlook's model of how > > e-mail works isn't really able to cope with what we need, it translates > > everything into internal formats in a way that is at best fragile for > > what we need. >=20 > Or, shock, horror, tell one-time contributors that it is OK to > put the patch in an attachment to the e-mail. Outlook doesn't > (usually) mess with the contents of attachments. That is what I do on my testing project. It might be nice to have the mail list software detect an attached text file, and incorporate it into the body so reviews could be done in the standard fashion, or to have git am detect attached messages. -- Tim