From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F2B3BF0 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 20:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot1-f65.google.com (mail-ot1-f65.google.com [209.85.210.65]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F147608 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 20:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot1-f65.google.com with SMTP id k9so18906922otl.10 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 13:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 23:09:53 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87ftwkpudb.fsf@xmission.com> References: <87ftwkpudb.fsf@xmission.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: ebiederm@xmission.com,Thomas Gleixner From: Christian Brauner Message-ID: Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Dmitry Safonov , Peter Zijlstra , Jeff Dike , Oleg Nesterov , John Stultz , Andy Lutomirski , Cyrill Gorcunov , Christian Brauner , Adrian Reber , Pavel Emelianov Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Multiple time domains List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On November 1, 2018 8:42:24 PM GMT+03:00, ebiederm@xmission=2Ecom wrote: >Thomas Gleixner writes: > >> Sorry for the late proposal, but this popped up recently=2E >> >> The recent discussion of the proposed time name spaces resulted in a >larger >> range of questions how to handle that correctly=2E Aside of that we >have >> other requests of supporting multiple time domains for various >reasons, >> e=2Eg=2E TSN folks in automotive and automation using grand clock maste= rs >with >> a completely screwed time base=2E >> >> As most of the relevant developers seem to be at LPC, I propose a >technical >> session dedicated to discuss the handling of multiple time domains=2E > >I will definitely be there=2E > >To whoever schedules these things can we please have this one of the >days that overlaps LPC=2E So that all of the CRIU and container folks >have a chance to show up=2E Ideally not during the CRIU or Container >mini >summit=2E I can be there and I agree with Eric: we should have LPC overlap without having containers/CRIU microconference = overlap=2E :) I have one more constraint=2E I have a talk at 2:30 pm for 15 min on the 1= 4th too=2E So if we could try to not do it at that time that would be great=2E Sorry for that! Christian