ksummit.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com,Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
	Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
	Adrian Reber <adrian@lisas.de>,
	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Multiple time domains
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 23:09:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D199F5CA-0A74-4886-891C-1D04786D03A5@brauner.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ftwkpudb.fsf@xmission.com>

On November 1, 2018 8:42:24 PM GMT+03:00, ebiederm@xmission.com wrote:
>Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:
>
>> Sorry for the late proposal, but this popped up recently.
>>
>> The recent discussion of the proposed time name spaces resulted in a
>larger
>> range of questions how to handle that correctly. Aside of that we
>have
>> other requests of supporting multiple time domains for various
>reasons,
>> e.g. TSN folks in automotive and automation using grand clock masters
>with
>> a completely screwed time base.
>>
>> As most of the relevant developers seem to be at LPC, I propose a
>technical
>> session dedicated to discuss the handling of multiple time domains.
>
>I will definitely be there.
>
>To whoever schedules these things can we please have this one of the
>days that overlaps LPC.  So that all of the CRIU and container folks
>have a chance to show up.  Ideally not during the CRIU or Container
>mini
>summit.

I can be there and I agree with Eric:
we should have LPC overlap without having containers/CRIU microconference overlap. :)
I have one more constraint. I have a talk at 2:30 pm for 15 min on the 14th too.
So if we could try to not do it at that time that would be great.

Sorry for that!
Christian

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-01 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-01 13:21 Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-01 17:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-01 17:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-11-01 20:09   ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2018-11-02  9:09 ` Pavel Emelianov
2018-11-03 17:13 ` Andrei Vagin
2018-11-03 18:47   ` Andy Tucker
2018-11-12 14:06 ` Dmitry Safonov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D199F5CA-0A74-4886-891C-1D04786D03A5@brauner.io \
    --to=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=adrian@lisas.de \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=dima@arista.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=xemul@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox