From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C6435AC for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 03:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from esa2.hgst.iphmx.com (esa2.hgst.iphmx.com [68.232.143.124]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E56FE175 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 03:47:21 +0000 (UTC) From: Bart Van Assche To: Mark Brown Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 03:47:13 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20188905.kHbMkj7sB6@avalon> <1834084.5qZ8rLimvk@avalon> <1492631703.3217.30.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <3f55980c-1e8d-c841-2555-472ed10eb2fc@sandisk.com> <20170425165632.5qvc62j2ex3h6rgg@sirena.org.uk> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: ksummit , Dave Airlie , Greg Kroah-Hartman , David Miller , James Bottomley , Doug Ledford , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] "Maintainer summit" invitation discussion List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 04/25/17 09:56, Mark Brown wrote:=0A= > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:02:12AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:=0A= >> I noticed myself is that for some subsystems I contribute to (e.g.=0A= >> block, SCSI and RDMA) maintainers provide feedback about patches within= =0A= >> a very reasonable time. For two other subsystems I contribute to it can= =0A= >> take weeks or months before adequate feedback is provided. Sorry but I= =0A= >> don't think that it is acceptable that it takes that long before=0A= >> feedback is provided and hence that this is a topic that deserves to be= =0A= >> discussed during the maintainer summit.=0A= >=0A= > This comes up most years... is a discussion likely to come up with=0A= > anything new that's concretely actionable?=0A= =0A= Hello Mark,=0A= =0A= If priorities change over time and someone who had initially sufficient =0A= time to be a kernel maintainer and later on that changes that's =0A= something I can understand. But what I do not understand is if someone =0A= no longer has enough time to be a kernel maintainer why he or she does =0A= not look for help and e.g. asks someone who has the required skills and =0A= who is interested in this kind of work to become a co-maintainer?=0A= =0A= Bart.=0A= =0A= =0A=