From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE7CC433E0 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 04:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 164F520684 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 04:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="aQAWV/vp" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 164F520684 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD1286816; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 04:09:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OfmqrrCfzfIi; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 04:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB4086822; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 04:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B30EC0893; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 04:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA89C016F for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 04:09:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5D286822 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 04:09:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kWmWpdeztohf for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 04:09:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ej1-f66.google.com (mail-ej1-f66.google.com [209.85.218.66]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53C7E86816 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 04:09:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-f66.google.com with SMTP id dp18so45164385ejc.8 for ; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 21:09:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Kd+hagxNLahxDCtppBjRUEK5tAfJnWOu81ahPEztSaE=; b=aQAWV/vpjJSXXFpPeSnG+kfh7lIyxfzTTwOYdEKW7QlmmS2VKBfdIeF9N2k88UppGc VH/DtzoShRTBp3M4emxE4DHRfm7n7p8p3/C8PU0P5jGTZfgfm9jXg406VhS5VuV+OyyG Vfgukri/R8fDyfCAW6m2Htts6MpWlzgluu7z5SNlK+8B8f6+vPR+6WLXT+H21/4hreMU 3txu3qWPmln0t3uT6YlhutbWPcYqglkwIxNM9z3hrcH5sRnaj9Q6CQR201CUAV9n0yr9 Tp8f2TzWiK1jcBSaBsZK9aQlMFsuAc7G2hjnbVFnPRDegUd6Z0WtMk280LPV+oIkNjNb 0TfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Kd+hagxNLahxDCtppBjRUEK5tAfJnWOu81ahPEztSaE=; b=Zd9Ovmh8yVPNOqCwI7fy/x+6iqxUaXMcsJ+Pex9Bp/o0ILUdyOXq5kY4IpLB3R6k05 F5hndkIU25bnI13KwDkv1T6uWlxdf4zsDutbigvEjaACulWZ34DR6lD5OgwhRRZzItoO 9ogUmGtzpbkIMoM8Y7+TT2+Es8mOZ0iRk4qyLjvT1vpYQbWojjgUfIOhy2iph7VAG+ol 40m7pV6fxNgZmUM/SfAwvSQ63d3wXeJAV61FyiE/lRqyObPMzzHW9KxEdVCN+b585U7r mlXswgXIKLTIQUF0GsxUjtTyrflwDNYhyuXHCfRtd5bsVXulU9XRkIWXUuGxDXXf5lQq xQVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315qxpMFNjtm3DYleCqNUE9EL1I1OTaY23aJEurgyksPdw6uRj+ lxyv21hA7MoqAxNmixkOYs9S9ECL90e0e94h84+NGg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPRqnkRZMh1ri4hzJHg5glOXCDJbyxpChWsHOcw8ODDEd5rTUzWvDESEc9IgnbrZlOqqJb1aAqJeDVIOGl5mY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1a54:: with SMTP id j20mr45158330ejf.455.1594094948779; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 21:09:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <159389297140.2210796.13590142254668787525.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20200706191555.GD6176@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20200706191555.GD6176@sirena.org.uk> From: Dan Williams Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 21:08:57 -0700 Message-ID: To: Mark Brown Cc: ksummit , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux Kernel Mailing List , tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Chris Mason Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology X-BeenThere: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Sender: "Ksummit-discuss" On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 12:16 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 01:02:51PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > > +'blacklist'. Recommended replacements for 'slave' are: 'secondary', > > +'subordinate', 'replica', 'responder', 'follower', 'proxy', or > > I'd second the suggestion of device as an option here. Sure, will do. I'm assuming you're thinking of cases where 'slave' is used in isolation without a paired relative term? If not, please clarify. > > > +Of course it is around this point someone jumps in with an etymological > > +argument about why people should not be offended. Etymological arguments > > +do not scale. The scope and pace of Linux to reach new developers > > +exceeds the ability of historical terminology defenders to describe "no, > > More generally etymological arguments are just not super relevant here > anyway, the issues people have are around current perceptions rather > than where things came from. > > > +not that connotation". The revelation of 2020 was that black voices were > > +heard on a global scale and the Linux kernel project has done its small > > +part to answer that call as it wants black voices, among all voices, in > > +its developer community. > > This, especially the bit about "revelation of 2020", sounds a little > off to me - I think it's that it's worryingly close to the frequently > derided pattern where people recognise a problem that other people have > been talking about for a while and treat it as something new. Perhaps a > more neutrally worded reference to current events and/or our desire to > improve instead? I'd just as soon let this commentary live in the archives if people need some more background. It's not like we have companion essays on the other recommendations in coding-style, and we seem to be converging on just amending coding-style. _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss