From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: ksummit <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] & [TECH TOPIC] Improve regression tracking
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 09:54:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4iOV2-hndx1rQmpPQF+myp=P8rmpf5JhXQXZxPhR6qoQw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170705140607.GA30187@kroah.com>
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 09:27:57AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> Your "b" above is what I would like to push. But who's going to enforce
>> this? With 10,000 changes per release, and a lot of them are fixes, the
>> best we can do is the honor system. Start shaming people that don't
>> have a regression test along with a Fixes tag (but we don't want people
>> to fix bugs without adding that tag either). There is a fine line one
>> must walk between getting people to change their approaches to bugs and
>> regression tests, and pissing them off where they start doing the
>> opposite of what would be best for the community.
>
> I would bet, for the huge majority of our fixes, they are fixes for
> specific hardware, or workarounds for specific hardware issues. Now
> writing tests for those is not an impossible task (look at what the i915
> developers have), but it is very very hard overall, especially if the
> base infrastructure isn't there to do it.
>
> For specific examples, here's the shortlog for fixes that went into
> drivers/usb/host/ for 4.12 after 4.12-rc1 came out. Do you know of a
> way to write a test for these types of things?
> usb: xhci: ASMedia ASM1042A chipset need shorts TX quirk
> usb: xhci: Fix USB 3.1 supported protocol parsing
> usb: host: xhci-plat: propagate return value of platform_get_irq()
> xhci: Fix command ring stop regression in 4.11
> xhci: remove GFP_DMA flag from allocation
> USB: xhci: fix lock-inversion problem
> usb: host: xhci-ring: don't need to clear interrupt pending for MSI enabled hcd
> usb: host: xhci-mem: allocate zeroed Scratchpad Buffer
> xhci: apply PME_STUCK_QUIRK and MISSING_CAS quirk for Denverton
> usb: xhci: trace URB before giving it back instead of after
> USB: host: xhci: use max-port define
> USB: ehci-platform: fix companion-device leak
> usb: r8a66597-hcd: select a different endpoint on timeout
> usb: r8a66597-hcd: decrease timeout
I wrote some test infrastructure to go after xhci TRB boundary
conditions [1]. So, yes, some of these are possible to unit test, but
of course not all.
[1]: http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=140872785411304&w=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-05 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-02 17:51 Thorsten Leemhuis
2017-07-03 16:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-03 18:50 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-04 19:03 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2017-07-05 12:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-05 13:09 ` Carlos O'Donell
2017-07-05 13:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-05 14:06 ` Greg KH
2017-07-05 14:28 ` Carlos O'Donell
2017-07-05 14:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-05 14:52 ` Mark Brown
2017-07-05 15:08 ` Carlos O'Donell
2017-07-05 16:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-06 11:34 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-07-09 13:46 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2017-07-05 14:33 ` Mark Brown
2017-07-05 14:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-05 14:50 ` James Bottomley
2017-07-05 14:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-05 15:09 ` James Bottomley
2017-07-05 15:20 ` Mark Brown
2017-07-05 15:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-07-05 15:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-05 15:32 ` James Bottomley
2017-07-05 15:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-05 18:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-05 18:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-05 15:16 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-07-05 15:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-05 15:36 ` James Bottomley
2017-07-05 16:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-05 16:58 ` James Bottomley
2017-07-05 17:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-05 16:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-07-05 16:58 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-05 17:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-06 9:28 ` Mark Brown
2017-07-06 9:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-06 14:53 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-07-06 21:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-06 14:48 ` James Bottomley
2017-07-07 10:03 ` Mark Brown
2017-07-31 16:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-07-31 20:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-31 20:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-08-02 16:53 ` Shuah Khan
2017-08-02 17:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-08-02 17:46 ` Shuah Khan
2017-08-02 17:58 ` Shuah Khan
2017-08-02 18:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-08-02 18:23 ` Randy Dunlap
2017-08-02 18:42 ` Shuah Khan
2017-08-03 3:03 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-08-03 17:42 ` Bird, Timothy
2017-08-03 22:11 ` Shuah Khan
2017-08-03 18:51 ` Shuah Khan
2017-08-04 1:15 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-07-07 3:33 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-07-07 4:52 ` Frank Rowand
2017-07-05 15:32 ` Greg KH
2017-07-05 15:36 ` Carlos O'Donell
2017-07-05 15:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-05 18:42 ` Greg KH
2017-07-05 18:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-06 22:24 ` Shuah Khan
2017-07-06 22:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-06 22:40 ` Shuah Khan
2017-07-05 16:54 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2017-07-05 18:45 ` Greg KH
2017-07-05 19:47 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-05 14:06 ` Carlos O'Donell
2017-07-05 15:47 ` Mark Brown
2017-07-07 6:15 ` Andrei Vagin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPcyv4iOV2-hndx1rQmpPQF+myp=P8rmpf5JhXQXZxPhR6qoQw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@leemhuis.info \
--cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox